How to Rank High in Google Real Time Search

by Stuart Morrison

December last year Google started listing real-time search results. These included Tweets from Twitter and other real-time sources.

In a recent interview Amit Singhal of Google disclosed how Google apportions rankings to these real-time search results.

In short, you need lots of followers.  And similar to rankings for webpages, high value followers will offer more value to the Tweet being followed.

Amit stated:

One user following another in social media is analogous to one page linking to another on the Web. Both are a form of recommendation,” Singhal says. “As high-quality pages link to another page on the Web, the quality of the linked-to page goes up. Likewise, in social media, as established users follow another user, the quality of the followed user goes up as well.

Google will need to determine the value of each user. However, this is unlikely to be too difficult for the likes of Google.


Posted: January 17, 2010 @ 10:03 pm

Yahoo to drop Paid Inclusion

by Stuart Morrison

Yahoo have given notice that they intend to drop their Paid Inclusion program, now known as Search Submit Pro. As of 31 December 2009 this, always controversial, option will cease to be available.

Paid inclusion has always been a controversial issue. The ability to pay for a listing in the natural search results has, for some, reduced the value of the Yahoo search engine. To a great extent this opinion has stuck. Despite Yahoo affirming that Paid Inclusion only guaranteed a listing, as opposed to a better rank, many in the SEO industry remained unimpressed.

The effect of this move will be significant. For Yahoo, Paid Inclusion was not a big earner, being worth around $100M a year. However a significant number of advertisers and agencies will be affected by the change and will need to adapt their strategies accordingly.

The SEO industry will welcome this move. It is widely considered that Yahoo produces highly relevant search results, often better than those returned by the other main search engines. Absorb’s brief in-house investigation using the BlindSearch tool backed this belief. However the paid nature of some listings has always cast doubt over these results. By freeing itself from the controversy of Paid Inclusion Yahoo will remove this doubt. Whether that leads to greater market-share remains to be seen.


Posted: October 19, 2009 @ 4:45 am

Google to allow Cross Domain Canonical Tag

by Stuart Morrison

Google announced at last week’s SMX East that they intend to all allow cross domain support for the canonical tag by the end of the year. This means that if you have more than one website you can tell Google that a page on one domain is actually a duplicate of a page on another site.

This change will no doubt be widely welcomed by webmasters and SEO professionals. Websites currently run the risk of being penalised for duplicate content. And because Google can never be certain which site originally produced the content (only that which it indexed first), the wrong site may be penalised. Using a cross domain canonical tag will help prevent this from happening.

Of particular interest to Absorb is the use of duplicate content in ‘white label’ sites. Retail and travel sites often provide content to ‘white label’ affiliates, who effectively plug-in content taken from the parent site. This use of duplicate content has an obvious risk of damage to rankings to the original site. By using a cross domain canonical tag, we would be able to remove this danger and preserve rankings.

A few commentators are pointing to possible downsides of the new tag. Some voices suggest it will be a means to hijack content. However if, as we hope, Google ensures strict rules, e.g. that all sites are verified in Webmaster Tools, such a scenario is unlikely.

Interestingly Bing and Yahoo have similarly shown interest in supporting the use of a canonical tag, but only within the same domain.


Posted: October 12, 2009 @ 11:14 pm

Why Google doesn’t penalise duplicate content

by Nick Wild

Google's Greg Gauthaus delivers the good news

CLEARED UP: Google's Greg Gauthaus delivers the good news

A post yesterday on Google Webmaster Central by Greg Grothaus attempts to clear up confusion about duplicate content.

Like most other SEO professionals, I’ve been chanting the mantra that “Duplicate Content is the 8th Deadly Sin” for a long time now. Greg’s post certainly doesn’t give carte blanche to those lowlifes who would copy the dictionary on to a website and call it their own in a bid to monopolise the search results, but it does show that not all duplicated content is a bad thing.

The official Google line is that they DO NOT penalise duplication, they penalise SPAM, and spammers have been known to use duplicate content.

We’re currently working on creating a sitemap for one of our clients as part of the strategy to get their site better indexed by the search engines. With many millions of pages on the site — even after excluding obvious duplicates — there are still a few examples which slip through the net. These are usually the result of different paths to the same content, mainly because customers use the site in individual ways.

What Greg says is that Google thinks this is fine; but, he argues, web masters should strive whereever possible to reduce duplication because …

  • It reduces the inherent authority of “page uniqueness”
  • It means searches can return user-hostile URLs
  • It spreads the “link-juice” of the duplicated pages
  • It means the search engines waste time indexing duplicated pages, and
  • It’s easy to fix with 301 redirects and the Google canonical tag

However, innocent duplication — especially where it is the product of a legitimate function of the website, such as breadcrumb navigation — will NOT be penalised.


Posted: September 16, 2009 @ 1:08 pm

NMA Conference – Getting the message across on Twitter

by Alex Pomery

A few of us at Absorb made our way over to the NMA Marketing on Twitter conference last week, for a round up of Twitter developments — from revenue streams to regulation.

Reporting on big success and even bigger business, Kerry Bridge (Digital media comms, Dell) gave an overview of Dell’s infamous Twitter feeds which have earned the company more than $3 million.  Dell’s feeds range from customer support for small businesses, sales of used Dell computers and general assistance for individuals.

Kerry strongly advocated the need for personalisation of Twitter accounts and how it was necessary to be an actual person as well as a representative of the business.

While Dell does very with its Twitter sales channels, Joe White — MD at Moonfruit — gave an insight into his companies “controversial” Twitter promo campaign.  The idea was simple, use the #moonfruit tag in any tweet and everyday one lucky tweeter will receive a MacBook Pro, for a 10-day period.

Inevitably users starting dropping the #moonfruit tag all over Twitter and this quickly pushed Moonfruit to the top of the Twitter trending topics.  Some saw this as a great marketing campaign, others saw it as spam (as did Twitter by the looks of things) but either way it certainly demonstrated the impact a creative Twitter campaign can have, with Moonfruit increasing traffic to its site by more than 600%, doubling its users and gaining tens of thousands of new followers.

Lastly, there was a little on the possibilities of future advertiser regulation, as well as an informative presentation from Ciaran Norris (Director, Mindshare Worldwide) covering a mind-boggling array of just some of the Twitter Apps out there.  Anything from trending apps such as Trendistic and Twitterfall, to music tweets on Blip.fm and a Michael Jackson tribute with Billie Tweets.


Posted: August 26, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes