Social Bookmarking – What to do with your Content

by Alex Pomery

Is content still king?  Well that probably depends on your website model, your presence on the web and potentially the industry your working in.  It’s most likely however, given the positive light in which Google views fresh content, that keeping your pages up to date with news, views, chat and general goings on will be an important facet of your web strategy.

The layout of key pages on your site, particularly your homepage, must facilitate and promote this dynamic content ensuring a fresh experience for users, giving them a reason to regularly come back to your site.  Good content and an accommodating design makes Google happy – as it crawls fresh content – but it needn’t stop there.  Syndicating your content across social bookmarking sites is a great way to maximise its potential positive impact on your site.

Putting your post onto top Social Bookmarking sites such as Delicious, Digg, StumbleUpon, hi5, Fark and Newsvine etc allows a far wider audience to interact with your content.  The key here is engaging copy.  Keyword stuffing, heavy ‘SEO copy’ and overt brand promotion won’t work well – bite sized and interesting themes will, as will good photos (in your blog post). Other channels such as Twitter and Facebook can help in similar ways, and don’t forget YouTube for your videos.

All this helps to increase your overall exposure on the web.  Instead of just one location, your profile/brand reaches across numerous channels.  Remember to include a link back to your site where possible and you can greatly increase your traffic – simply by getting your content out there, as opposed to keeping it ‘siloed’ on your site.


Posted: November 9, 2009 @ 2:14 pm

Online video should be fit for purpose

by John Hobson

YouTube has an interesting video doing the rounds – it’s called the 100 Greatest Hits of YouTube in 4 Minutes. What you may notice is the lion share of clips are unrehearsed, unplanned and are UGC – I counted under 20 that I thought were actually staged.

‘Will it Blend’ stands out as the only direct brand penetrating this top 100 (discounting Rick Ashley) and is also noticeable for its linear production values. Traditional preoccupations about quality and detail are almost without exception turned on its head here (this is down to many factors which I will address in a future blog post) but ultimately its obvious brands have to think differently on digital on video.

Replicating the magic of mishaps is just one of the challenges for online video producers – and then you have to make sure your brand is in the background when it happens! The way we film for TV clearly has to be different when we film for a fraction of the screen real estate.

For the time being, don’t be paralysed by the need to get content going viral – by its definition very few videos push through to this hallowed ground – be rational in your projections and scope and most importantly understand who you are targeting.  By all means use the online tools available, seed the clip wherever relevant and link whenever possible but don’t be unrealistic – KPI’s that don’t hit disappoint – which is no good for anybody.

Video sharing is ultimately a democratic process – if it’s good it will grab attention, be passed on and gain in popularity. If its crap it will be lost – the next candidate is only one email away.


Posted: November 5, 2009 @ 2:13 pm

Yahoo to drop Paid Inclusion

by Stuart Morrison

Yahoo have given notice that they intend to drop their Paid Inclusion program, now known as Search Submit Pro. As of 31 December 2009 this, always controversial, option will cease to be available.

Paid inclusion has always been a controversial issue. The ability to pay for a listing in the natural search results has, for some, reduced the value of the Yahoo search engine. To a great extent this opinion has stuck. Despite Yahoo affirming that Paid Inclusion only guaranteed a listing, as opposed to a better rank, many in the SEO industry remained unimpressed.

The effect of this move will be significant. For Yahoo, Paid Inclusion was not a big earner, being worth around $100M a year. However a significant number of advertisers and agencies will be affected by the change and will need to adapt their strategies accordingly.

The SEO industry will welcome this move. It is widely considered that Yahoo produces highly relevant search results, often better than those returned by the other main search engines. Absorb’s brief in-house investigation using the BlindSearch tool backed this belief. However the paid nature of some listings has always cast doubt over these results. By freeing itself from the controversy of Paid Inclusion Yahoo will remove this doubt. Whether that leads to greater market-share remains to be seen.


Posted: October 19, 2009 @ 4:45 am

Content is about evolution, not revolution

by Nick Wild

We’re currently rewriting the content at Absorbing.com: not because it’s wrong, but because the best can always be improved.

As a digital agency we know how important it is to get the keyword densities correct, the subject matter on target and the back-end code optimised.

However, we also know that it’s important to make the site readable, so we’re paying just as much attention to how it reads to humans as to search engine spiders.

In fact search engines — especially Google — are now very good at looking beyond the “grey hat” techniques that make copy stilted, forced, robotic and, at times, virtually unreadable.

While we want to appear at the top of any search of Google, Bing, Yahoo, Ask and the rest by potential customers on the look-out for good SEO skills or joined-up SEM and PPC mastery, we also want those visitors to be able to fully appreciate our search services when they arrive.

Absorb is lucky that it has such a wide range of skills in-house, including excellent copyrighting for the web, so look out for the new pages and new posts from Absorb staff as part of our continuing commitment to customers old and new.


Posted: September 30, 2009 @ 10:18 am

Why Google doesn’t penalise duplicate content

by Nick Wild

Google's Greg Gauthaus delivers the good news

CLEARED UP: Google's Greg Gauthaus delivers the good news

A post yesterday on Google Webmaster Central by Greg Grothaus attempts to clear up confusion about duplicate content.

Like most other SEO professionals, I’ve been chanting the mantra that “Duplicate Content is the 8th Deadly Sin” for a long time now. Greg’s post certainly doesn’t give carte blanche to those lowlifes who would copy the dictionary on to a website and call it their own in a bid to monopolise the search results, but it does show that not all duplicated content is a bad thing.

The official Google line is that they DO NOT penalise duplication, they penalise SPAM, and spammers have been known to use duplicate content.

We’re currently working on creating a sitemap for one of our clients as part of the strategy to get their site better indexed by the search engines. With many millions of pages on the site — even after excluding obvious duplicates — there are still a few examples which slip through the net. These are usually the result of different paths to the same content, mainly because customers use the site in individual ways.

What Greg says is that Google thinks this is fine; but, he argues, web masters should strive whereever possible to reduce duplication because …

  • It reduces the inherent authority of “page uniqueness”
  • It means searches can return user-hostile URLs
  • It spreads the “link-juice” of the duplicated pages
  • It means the search engines waste time indexing duplicated pages, and
  • It’s easy to fix with 301 redirects and the Google canonical tag

However, innocent duplication — especially where it is the product of a legitimate function of the website, such as breadcrumb navigation — will NOT be penalised.


Posted: September 16, 2009 @ 1:08 pm
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes